There are very few parts of my writing rhythm that I’ve hung onto from the beginning, but taking a break between writing my first draft and editing my manuscript is a big one.

I first read about the idea of taking time off between a draft and edits in Stephen King’s On Writing. He says:

“How long you let your book rest–sort of like bread dough between kneadings–is entirely up to you, but I think it should be a minimum of 6 weeks.”

Stephen King, On Writing

After reading that, I decided the next time I finished a manuscript, I would give this a try.

When I had my first chance in the summer of 2004, the six weeks off were excruciating. I caved after two days and pulled up my manuscript. I fretted about all the changes I wanted to make to the first chapter. I put it away and called my best friend (who wasn’t a writer, but was very supportive) to confess what I’d done, and she scolded me. “Why did you do that? You said six weeks. Stay out of there!”

She was right, and I was good after that. I used my time to study other titles that I felt were similar to mine, and by the time I opened my manuscript up six weeks later, my perspective on what a YA story should read like had altered drastically.

For the most part, ever since that misstep in 2004, I have been faithful about taking six weeks off, except for in a few situations:

Why You Might Not Want To Take Six Weeks Off

You have a deadline

This is the #1 reason I shorten my time between my first draft and edits. Sometimes there’s no space in the schedule for a luxurious six week vacation from my first draft.

It doesn’t make sense with your schedule

The few other times that I haven’t followed Stephen King’s six week rule was because I would mark the time out on the calendar and realize, “Oh, that means I would start edits the week my kids get out of school for the summer…” In those times I will shorten my time away.

Why Taking Six Weeks Off Can Be The Best Thing For You and Your Manuscript

While there are a few good reasons that I’ve found for not taking my six weeks off, impatience is not a good one. Here are the benefits I’ve found of taking so much time off:

Rest and recovery time

Typically when I’ve finished a manuscript, I’ve pushed myself hard to get to the end. I need the break from staring at the computer, I need to breathe fresh air and do a few loads of laundry. To be a healthy writer, I need to give myself that space.

Time to work on other ideas

Often times, I have new story ideas or other writing-related tasks that I’ve put off and put off and put off trying to get this manuscript done. Having a rule that I can’t touch the finished manuscript for six weeks gives me plenty of head space to work on new ideas and other tasks. And getting absorbed in brainstorming another story or in reading other books is really helpful for what I’ll talk about next.

Clearer vision

When I come back to my manuscript and I’ve been away so long, it’s amazing to read through the whole thing. There are parts that I don’t remember writing, parts that I thought were brilliant as I wrote them but now I see how rushed they are, conversations that made me laugh when I wrote them and still make me laugh. The time away helps me to see everything far more clearly.

The words feel less precious

If I’ve just written a chapter, it’s much harder for me to go in and whack it all up in edits. I just wrote it, so all the sweat that went into getting those words on the page is still fresh in my memory.

But if I wrote that chapter months ago, it’s amazing how much easier it feels to decide to drastically alter it, or even cut it. “Kill your darlings” becomes much easier advice to follow when you didn’t create your darlings so recently.

I’m a BIG believer in the six weeks off that Stephen King suggests, but writers all work differently from each other and there’s no One Right Way to finish a novel.

I’m curious about what you think. If you’ve finished a first draft and edited the manuscript, did you take a break between?