I’m not going to swear that my method for editing will work for you, but it has served me well over the years.

As a kid, I always thought of editing as “tidying up” whatever words I already had on the page. I’m not sure when I realized that editing wasn’t just about cleaning up the words, but making sure they were the best words. And if they weren’t, cutting them. Putting in new words.

And at some point, I realized editing a novel wasn’t the same as editing a 5-paragraph essay. That editing a book wasn’t just smoothing out words, but also ideas like plot, character, and theme.

Edits can feel overwhelming even if you’ve done it before. I hope sharing my process helps make editing feel more doable.

After taking my six weeks away from the manuscript (hopefully), the first thing I do is read the book on my Kindle with a notebook next to me. I like reading on my Kindle because I can’t make changes in the manuscript. Also because I do a lot of pleasure reading on my Kindle, so being on there puts me in a different head space than reading on my computer.

In my notebook, I keep a running list of a couple things:

What needs fixed: This could be big things like, “My villain doesn’t enter the story until after the halfway point.” Or, “The first scene of chapter seven goes nowhere and needs a point.” My notes might also be little things, “I have two characters named Jack.” If it needs fixing, it goes on the list.

What needs researched: Especially now that I mostly write historical fiction, this is a big list.

What I want to ponder: This is where I put questions like, “Could I delete one of her friends?” Or, “This sentence struck me as I read. Would this be a better theme?” These are things that I maybe want to change, but I want to think on them more.

You might have other details you find you want to track. If you write fantasy or sci-fi, it could be beneficial to keep a list of world-building issues that you identify.

After I’ve built my lists, I get to make another list (I love lists!) from all the data I’ve collected. This becomes my “Editing To-Do list” and I organize it from “Highest impact” to “Lowest impact.”

Usually my lists are quite long, but for the sake of an example, say I’m creating my Editing To-Do list from these items:

Needs fixed:

  • Dialogue at family dinner in chapter one
  • In chapter 4, I foreshadow that the cousin is going to come visit and then it never happens
  • Main character’s best friend needs more depth.

To research:

  • What kind of food was served in schools in this era?
  • How did police investigations work?
  • What was involved in making a phone call to a different city?

What I want to ponder:

  • Do I lose anything if I cut the main character’s quiet friend?
  • In several places, my main character considers her future. Are her expectations consistent with what girls would’ve thought in this era?

Looking at those lists, here are the “high-impact” items from all three: Cousin visiting, police investigations, cutting the quiet friend

Here are medium-impact items: Adding depth to best friend, main character considering her future.

Here are the lower-impact items: Dialogue at family dinner, phone call to another city, food served in schools

“Story impact” is a subjective term. For example, if the best friend is a major character, adding depth to her might mean that you’re making tweaks to 50% of the pages of your manuscript. But the changes likely won’t have ripple effects that impact the plot or other characters. So, I would personally rank “cousin visiting” over “adding depth to best friend” only because I’ll need to add multiple scenes, plus make sure the rest of the book reflects the cousin having visited.

Anything that impacts just one scene or helps you fill out a few more details goes under lower impact.

You also might decide that you want to answer any questions you’re pondering and take care of all research before you do anything else. That can work too! Finding the system that works best for you is the key, not duplicating my system perfectly.

Once I have my Editing To-Do list compiled and arranged, then I start from the high impact items and work my way down.

Why edit this way? Why not edit chronologically?

The reason I don’t like editing chronologically is it hurts my brain.

Because if my plan is to start in chapter one and make all necessary changes until I reach the end of my book, that’s an awful lot to try and hold in my head. I have to remember those big plot changes I’m going to make in the future, the character I need to deepen, the character I need to cut, the new theme I’m working in, and so forth. And that’s on top of whatever issues this specific scene has that I need to fix. Chronological editing just doesn’t work for me at this early point in edits.

Next week, I’ll talk more about the “macro edit.”

If you have questions, I’m happy to answer them!

Here’s another post you might find helpful: Editing for the first time? 5 thoughts to help you make sense of it.